Hello, i'd like to understand if any infrastructure used to host the mailing lists, wiki, the public site, bug trackers, git, pootle, etc., in general, anything that helps provide Koha to the community needs a re-look in the light of plans for the Koha foundation. i haven't researched this yet, but i know, for example that at least (one of?) the demo servers are run by LibLime, the chat channel is hosted on Katipo's servers, etc. I'd like to clarify that i am not imputing any disrespect for these services and the people that very kindly provide them to the community, i am not casting any doubts as to their continuity, etc... Do people think it is preferable in any way to ensure any contracts or other agreements for hosting, etc. are directly entered into between the (to-be-formed) foundation and public service providers. In such a scenario, the foundation can exercise complete control over the resources it uses, and the community then helps administer them. Ahead of the Koha foundation meeting on the 15th, i volunteer to host some or all such services, if any are needed, as well as volunteer time to administer some of them. i am also willing to pitch in to fund such services. Best regards, krishnan m Pune, India Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com