Hi, On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Henri-Damien LAURENT <laurenthdl@alinto.com> wrote:
My comment : Really good Idea, even though I am not really keen on getting more and more tables without a good MCD.
MCD? I don't recognize that acronym.
(There was one for 2.2 but it is not up to date for 3.0. Maybe QA manager should/has to do it ;).... ) But My Question : When ? When are you planning to do that ? Is this Vital for Koha 3.0 features ? Shouldn't this wait for 3.2 ?
IMO, this should be done now, and I'm prepared to have patches done by tomorrow. I have observed at least one instance where Koha permitted more than one issue to be made for the same item, which a PK constraint on issues would have caught. There are already a number of blockers involving holds functionality that will require extensive work, and I expect that I will turn up more circulation bugs as I work through cleaning up holds. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Koha Application Developer LibLime galen.charlton@liblime.com p: 1-888-564-2457 x709