On 2012-11-16, at 9:07 AM, Robin Sheat wrote:
Op 16-11-12 09:00, MJ Ray schreef:
I feel that would be misrepresenting GPL2+ code as GPL3+ - lying, more or less. I would prefer it if we only updated headers to GPL3+ when the code in that file actually changes to require the licence change.
There is no real point changing the headers on their own, but changing them if there's a particular desire or reason to isn't bad. If I add code, and I want it to be GPL3+, changing the headers is then the correct thing to do.
TBH, if we changed a couple of core parts (e.g. C4::Context and C4::Template) that would effectively flow on to the rest of the bundle, unless someone who particularly wanted a GPL2 version reverted them.
Robin.
either of those two suggestions sound great to me