I'm not requesting to remove the sign-off. I'm saying our code reaches bugzilla already "signed-off" at least twice (project manager and customer/library), Paul, Nicole, I'm very confused, if your stuff is "signed off" why not just stick
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> wrote: the -s in the format-patch command and be done with it? Show everyone that it's signed off and it will go to QA and not have to wait for the rest of us to sign off again. It's because we can't ask the customer or the project manager (a
Le 12/05/2011 16:58, Nicole Engard a écrit : librarian) to git format-patch -s ! They are validating the feature by testing, and say "OK, it works". So no "signed-off by XXX" on the patch. Do you think/mean we should just create all our patches with status "signed-off" ? It's a kind of "shortcut" / "A-developer" isn't it ? -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08