I tried the 6509 but that did not work on the extraction David Ian Bays wrote:
Hi. These are potentially two quite different requirements although solutions may be closely related. David is asking about the Koha-generated $9 subfields (RLIN) against authorised values for subjects, authors etc coming out. I see in the Tools> MARC Export screen you can elect to "Don't export fields" which you could enter (say) "1009 1109 6509 6909" following the example on screen this should exclude subfield 9 of 100, 110, 650 and 690 tags. I have not tried it but it looks as if it should do what you are asking...
As for the discussion on the 9xx tags on import I would think a similar options field on import that allows to exclude fields or subfields would be useful to many. It might also be good if the values entered were persistent in some way so you don't need to remember them and re-enter every time.
Hope that helps. Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "MJ Ray" <mjr@phonecoop.coop> To: <koha-devel@lists.koha.org>; <dschust1@tx.rr.com> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:17 PM Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Marc Extract and subject headings
David Schuster <dschust1@tx.rr.com> wrote:
I am doing a full MARC extraction and with the subject headings am seeing: $9 with numbers. I don't see a way to strip that off unless I do it somehow after the extraction. This is messy for those of us sending to another utility like Biblios or OCLC. [...] Any suggestions or is this a bug needing to be reported looking for an enhancement?
I was recently discussing stripping certain "local 9" tags and subtags out of MARC records on *import* with Galen Charlton on IRC. This discussion was as follows (edited for clarity. E&O mine):-
<slef> is there a reason why koha doesn't blank the local use 9 fields from staged imports?
<gmcharlt> slef: 9xx tags? any, or just the ones mapped to items?
<slef> everything except 942 really and 098
<gmcharlt> well, it's not correct behavior to always drop 9xx tags - a library may want some/all of them. Of course, one could add an option to remove such tags.
<slef> when would a library want some/all of them?
<gmcharlt> slef: really depends on what the 9xx from the source are for; can't just unilaterally remove them thus, a remove selected tags from import option would be a useful enhancement
<slef> 9xxs are meant to be local use only, aren't they? So very few libraries will be relying on values in there. But anyway, a "remove from import" option may be a useful enhancement then?
<gmcharlt> slef: but it could be *their* local use - e.g., order information from MARC records sent by book vendor, information used by a local union catalog, bibliographic utility information, etc.
<slef> gmcharlt: I see. Suspect the default should be strip, shouldn't it?
<gmcharlt> slef: I'd suggest letting user set up a profile defining which tags they want removed.
So, have we understood it correctly: unless told otherwise, let the "local-9" tags and subtags through?
Would people want to remove different local-9s from import and export, or are there cases where the same ones would need removing from both?
Thanks, -- MJ Ray (slef) LMS developer and webmaster at | software www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk | .... co Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html | .... op _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.12.91/2201 - Release Date: 06/25/09 06:22:00
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Marc-Extract-and-subject-headings-tp24202653p24247833.... Sent from the Koha - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.