At 11:17 AM 1/9/2012 -0500, Galen Charlton wrote:
Hi,
On 01/09/2012 10:32 AM, Zeno Tajoli wrote:
Well, in theory 999 are repetable,
Actually, that's a problem. The 999 is indeed marked as repeatable in the (MARC21) frameworks, but since it is used to store the biblio(item)number, it really shouldn't be marked as repeatable (or even editable by staff users). Does anybody see any problem making it non-repeatable?
As far as I can see, they already appear to be non-repeatable (unless I modded the default framework in 3.2 and it's been imported into 3.6.) I find all four subfields (a, b, c and d) non-repeatable (according to the check box) and it doesn't seem to make much difference whether they are "ignored" or in tab 0 as no cataloguer will be able to attempt an edit|modification. Am I missing something? Or have I done something stupid? Thanks - Paul
Regards,
Galen -- Galen Charlton Director of Support and Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: gmc@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
--- Maritime heritage and history, preservation and conservation, research and education through the written word and the arts. <http://UltraMarine.ca>, <http://AandC.org> and <http://MarDoc.ca>