19 Aug
2010
19 Aug
'10
12:31 p.m.
Le 19/08/2010 12:43, Salvador Zaragoza Rubio a écrit :
In this implementation the subfields are passed (lexically sorted) to the template for displaying purposes. So I think is fixed. Anyway I'll look into the database solution.
good idea, as some (few ?) librarians says they would be happy to have by default a sorting that is not alphabetical (like $a$x$y$z$h$i$j) -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08