11 May
2011
11 May
'11
8:24 p.m.
Hi, On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Cormack <chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> wrote:
1/ Continue with the current workflow, patches signed off, passed qa, then into master, with the goal to increase the rate patches are signed off
+1
As Paul has noted in another thread, I am not comfortable with allowing patches into master untested, and I don't think I could do a good job as RM if that were to become the case. In that case I would rather become one of the developers submitting patches again, so perhaps 3 and 4 are the same for me.
This would be a huge step backwards. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt@gmail.com