To me it makes a lot of sense only to have bug fixes in 3.0.4 and all new features in 3.2. But what are the workload implications? Bob
-----Original Message----- From: koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha.org [mailto:koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha.org] On Behalf Of LAURENT Henri-Damien Sent: Thursday, 3 September 2009 10:41 PM To: koha-devel Subject: [Koha-devel] Reconciliation branch --mail à destination de la communauté Besoin de ton aval
Hi, After discussing in Yesterday's IRC meeting we have two options : a) test master AND reconciliation branch at about the same time which would double the work. But reconciliation branch could be already there (you can check it out from koha-maintenance/reconciliation)
b) rework the reconciliation branch and come down to a simple bug fixing branch. Thus, we can expect 3.2 will be out on time. And 3.0.4 will contain only bugfixes and will be more stable but will take some overtime to make it. And we would have only one month to wait for all the enhanced contents, and only one version to test thoroughly. 3.0.x would include only bug fixes and would therfore respect the purpose of a stable branch.
I have done some job on this reconciliation and I included much more than just bug fixes. But still, I would rather have something more stable and which fix problems than something likely to bring up (and doubles) problems. And I think that it would be sensible too.
I wanted to give you the opportunity to speak your minds and tell what you want. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT Release Maintainer 3.0.x _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 18:03:00