"Kyle Hall" <kyle.m.hall@gmail.com> wrote:
Do you trust O'Reilly <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1438>?
Enough for this. Thanks for the link. So, one of subversion's managers was the author of anon-cvs, if I understand that right.
On another note, who cares? This is not germane to the topic at hand. It was just a passing comment.
If it's off-topic, don't mention it. OTOH, I think it was relevant, suggesting that subversion was made by experienced gurus. Maybe, but no more than many: svn devels didn't seem to understand Tom Lord's explanations (he's good on version control design, but maybe not so good on user interaction), I've seen horribly-wedged svn servers and IIRC svn's early mv command was basically an rm and an add, which was no better than cvs.
I think you need to relax a little ; )
Don't rely on detecting emotional states from the words people use - it varies massively from place to place. Instead, rely on what they write. In other words: I'm quite relaxed. Thanks for your concern. Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Webmaster/web developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop maker, developer of koha, debian, gobo, gnustep, various mail and web s/w. Workers co-op @ Weston-super-Mare, Somerset http://www.ttllp.co.uk/