Hi to all, Il 09/01/2012 15:55, Galen Charlton ha scritto:
Could you elaborate more on the use case this would support? The framework code is displayed in the bib editor, for example, which is one point where a cataloger would need to know about it. Adding it to the MARC framework would make it available for searching and make it a little more convenient to display the framework code in XSLT OPAC displays -- but to what end?
oh, is quite simple. I want to export data in marc format to import in an other Koha and I use different frameworks to catalogue. If I insertr biblio.frameworkcode, I can re-import records in different frameworks. Clearly I need to setup 'marc to Koha links' before to import with bulkmarcimport.pl
For MARC21 frameworks, if we were add to this to the default framework, I'd prefer that the 942 or the 999 be used, as those are already supported for bib-level mappings -- no need to carve out another tag.
Well, in theory 999 are repetable, 942 is not repetable. So for me is better 942. A new subfield or we re-use $a ? The subfield used are [default framework]: -- 942 0 Koha issues (borrowed), 2 Source of classification or shelving scheme 6 Koha normalized classification for sorting a Institution code [OBSOLETE] c Koha [default] item type e Edition h Classification part i Item part k Call number prefix m Call number suffix n Suppress in OPAC s Serial record flag Bye Zeno Tajoli -- Dott. Zeno Tajoli tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it fax +39 02 2135520 CILEA - Consorzio Interuniversitario http://www.cilea.it/disclaimer