9 Nov
2011
9 Nov
'11
5:54 p.m.
On 2011-11-8, at 3:42 AM, MJ Ray wrote:
Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
Let's say Limoges library has sponsored stuff that has resulted in atomicupdate/limogeupdate.pl [...] Does anyone see a problem with this new updatedatabase procedure ?
The only problem that I can see is that we should encourage updates to be .sql not .pl files.
oooh, great idea! i think this would simplify the proposed process even more do other people agree?