Hi! Morning here, maybe my brain is not ignited yet. But why such a rule? (if i understand its meaning correctly). Thanks, Philippe Blouin, Responsable du développement informatique Tél. : (888) 604-2627 philippe.blouin@inLibro.com <mailto:philippe.blouin@inLibro.com> inLibro | pour esprit libre | www.inLibro.com <http://www.inLibro.com> On 09/28/2015 10:31 PM, David Cook wrote:
Hi again:
I also noticed there’s no rule forbidding subroutine definitions in PL scripts. I thought that we had a rule against that as well…
David Cook
Systems Librarian
Prosentient Systems
72/330 Wattle St, Ultimo, NSW 2007
*From:*David Cook [mailto:dcook@prosentient.com.au] *Sent:* Tuesday, 29 September 2015 12:27 PM *To:* 'koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org' <koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org> *Subject:* Add rule for experimental features in coding guidelines
Hi all:
I just noticed that we don’t actually have a rule against using experimental features (e.g. smartmatch ~~, given/when) in the coding guidelines. We impose this rule during the testing/QA process, but it’s not actually documented.
What do we need to do to add a rule? Bring this up at a meeting?
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Coding_Guidelines
David Cook
Systems Librarian
Prosentient Systems
72/330 Wattle St, Ultimo, NSW 2007
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/