Andrew Moore a écrit :
So far, they have consisted only of these emails I've been sending out from git. They contain a "0" patch that contains no code, but just documentation. Then the patches show the creation of the C4::Schema object and a few examples of how we could use it.
Now that it is looking more likely that this project is viable, perhaps I need to start a wiki page for it and capture some of these ideas and concerns in a little more permanent fashion. I only have time to work on this type of project on Fridays, so look for that this Friday. Feel free to start it or add to it if you would like.
Thanks for your help, -Andy
Hi you are doing a great job documenting and investigating. Thank you. I still had no time investigating or testing. But I am very glad of such a plan to get an ORM in Koha.
Looking at the page you link to on wiki in terms of performances, I can see that RDBO seems to be a quicker ORM than DBIC. And we already have some performance issue on Circulation. Have you considered this alternate ORM which I have come across only some days ago ? Or will we have to use DBI, which is still 8 times faster (according to the tests http://code.google.com/p/rose/wiki/RDBOBenchmarksWithDBI ) than DBIC for circulation which is a critical part in Koha ?
I donot want to slow down things. But I want to be sure that what we choose is the best alternative to fit our requirements. Speed is definitely a major concern here ... and I believe it's one of
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:04 AM, Henri-Damien LAURENT <laurenthdl@alinto.com> wrote: the reasons that Koha originally wasn't written with an ORM. Andy, any thoughts about what this choice will mean w/respect to performance? Cheers, -- Joshua Ferraro SUPPORT FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CEO migration, training, maintenance, support LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS jmf@liblime.com |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS