I'd say it should be evaluated on a per-bug/patch basis. Overall I agree, but let the QAM and the RM have the final word about the bugs qualifying for this proposed fast-track treatment. I will add this to tomorrow's agenda for formally talking about this. 2015-08-20 12:44 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Druart < jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>:
I should have added that I can engage my own responsibility and will provide a fix as quickly as possible if the patch introduced a regression or was buggy.
2015-08-20 15:03 GMT+01:00 Marcel de Rooy <M.de.Rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>:
So I suggest that for some patches, the ones with a minor severity, small or template changes could, IMO, bypass the signoff step.
This idea comes up every now and then (just as we see our queues growing and slinking again..). I would suggest to make the Complexity field mandatory. Some people do not fill it. And if the Complexity== Trivial or String, test it yourself and put your own signoff below. Everything above Trivial needs another signoff.
Marcel _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/