I think everyone would agree that more checking of code is good. As long as you and Paul and Josh are willing to put in a bit more time, I imagine everyone will be all for it. I think the big question is *how much* more time will it require from you guys. I think only the people currently using git will be able to help us answer us. Kyle On 3/16/07, Chris Cormack <chris@katipo.co.nz> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:04:30PM -0400, Kyle Hall said:
Thank you for illuminating us on the ways of git ; ) It seems from you're description if there are lot's of Kyle's, that the likes of Chris and Paul are in for more work that previously. I, on the other hand, would be effected little.
Speaking as Chris
I don't think this is nessecarily a bad thing, a bit more checking as code comes in can save a bunch of time in the future. I guess what I'm saying is we should be doing something like this currently anyway, at least we should be sanity checking code as its committed. We wouldnt end up with dual implementation of the same feature, and some of the duplicate code we now have.
Chris
-- Chris Cormack Programmer 027 4500 789 Katipo Communications Ltd chris@katipo.co.nz www.katipo.co.nz
-- IT Tech Crawford County Federated Library System