* Philippe Blouin (philippe.blouin@inlibro.com) wrote:
Hi, Changing the API would be quite simple. But not making it "retro-compatible" could be a nightmare to some installs. In our case, we "published" the addresses as call-backs. Correcting those in the remote systems could be a drag, way more than the usual rebase/upgrade/fix involving code.
Just a thought.
Hi All I think we you want to do something like this (change a published and in use API) then we should version it. So that the current in use version can be version one, we make a new version 2 of the API people can transition to it. At some point in the future (maybe) we get rid of version 1 Chris -- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand