On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
* Galen Charlton (gmc@esilibrary.com) wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Julian Maurice < julian.maurice@biblibre.com> wrote:
A proof-of-concept patch was made and is attached to Bug 13799 [2].
Are we ready to jump to requiring a minimum of Perl 5.18? My read of the Mojolicious FAQ [1] is that 5.18 and 5.20 are well supported at present, while 5.10 is best effort. "Best effort" for frameworks does not, however, inspire great confidence in me.
This is by not necessarily a showstopper -- Debian Jessie will ship with 5.20, Ubuntu Trusty ships 5.18, and so forth -- but if we're not ready to make the jump in Perl versions, I would suggest finding a different framework to use.
[1]
http://mojolicio.us/perldoc/Mojolicious/Guides/FAQ#Which-versions-of-Perl-ar...
I'd like to hear what the advantages of us using Mojolicious are, vs something like Raisin?
https://metacpan.org/pod/Raisin
Chris
Raisin was the first proposed tool to build the API. We found it was Plack-only, and that it implemented an outdated version of Swagger, which seemed a requirement for people proposing it. Mojolicious was found to be CGI-friendly, and also has a Swagger2 plugin. I'm not saying those are blockers, but that was part of the discussion. -- Tomás Cohen Arazi Prosecretaría de Informática Universidad Nacional de Córdoba ✆ +54 351 5353750 ext 13168 GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F