Hello There 3 batch of patches depending of one another : - Bug 8962 is formally dependant of 11202, and I don't want to rewrite it without the dependancy - It is not formally dependant of 11291, but before writing the "DOM" patches of 8962, I prefer to see the mechanism proposed in bug 11291 tested pushed into master, before adapting it for 8962 So I won't wrote the DOM patches for Bug 8962 before - bugs 11202 and 11291 are be signed off, qaed and push into master and - Bug 8962 has received at least a signed off for the 3 patches currently attached (made for GRS1). I think I will have some free hours to work on that in december or january, but probably not after. Regards, M. Saby Le 25/11/2013 08:46, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
The question is : is it good or not to have a way to find information anywhere in a record, really anywhere, whatever the field or subfield? I would favor: anywhere=all specific indexes. "Really anywhere" will cost more and will perhaps index fields that you do not even want to index. It should always be possible to exclude a field from indexing.
In fact it raises a second question: even if it is usefull for staff to have a broad (on all specific indexes) or even a broader (on all fields of the record) index, it is a good thing that this index is used in OPAC simple search ? I believe not. Because some data are not made to be searched by an average user, and can even make a precise search on a subject more difficult. I agree.
-- Mathieu Saby Service d'Informatique Documentaire Service Commun de Documentation Université Rennes 2 Téléphone : 02 99 14 12 65 Courriel : mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.fr