2010/11/4 Kyle Hall <kyle.m.hall@gmail.com>:
It looks like I jumped the gun. This looks like it's about commercial support, not features, except where marked on the linked page.
That's not how I read it. It appears to me that your first assessment was correct. The first row of the chart shows support availability. Classic has no support available. The subsequent rows compare features. Clearly InnoDB is *not* checked in the MySQL Classic column. PG support is a goal for 3.4 IIRC, however, MariaDB (http://mariadb.org/) bills itself as a drop-in replacement for MySQL and developed and maintained by some of the folks who originally wrote MySQL. Kind Regards, Chris PS: This is yet *another* reason for the Koha community to refuse to allow the project to become vendor dominated/controlled. Let's be sure we are awake and smelling the coffee.