9 Jan
2012
9 Jan
'12
4 p.m.
Hi to all, Il 09/01/2012 16:55, Ian Walls ha scritto:
I support 942$f for the following reasons:
1. best to use an existing tag, and 942 is the best-fit candidate for non-repeating biblio-level, Koha-specific information
2. New subfields for new content, rather than repurposing an old field (and possibly having data conflicts on systems that still have the old, obsolete value)
3. subfield letter is the initial (in English) for the thing being stored; easy to remember!
for me 942 $f is OK. Bye Zeno Tajoli -- Dott. Zeno Tajoli tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it fax +39 02 2135520 CILEA - Consorzio Interuniversitario http://www.cilea.it/disclaimer