Liked that article! As relative new member of the community, I am wondering if the current signoff/passed_qa procedure really encourages new members to keep sending patches. It could happen easily now that a patch does not get any attention. What makes someone now select a patch for signoff? Coincidence, contacts, application feature? imo we need some more structure at the signoff side. We have the Bugzilla categories that define the default assignment for a new bug. Would it be useful to assign a default signer per category too? Such assignments could be evaluated regularly to see if they still work. Marcel ________________________________________ Van: koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha-community.org [koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha-community.org] namens Paul Poulain [paul.poulain@biblibre.com] Verzonden: maandag 9 mei 2011 15:46 Aan: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org Onderwerp: [Koha-devel] Document to read Hello, chris gave this url on IRC, I think it's worth sharing : http://www.codesimplicity.com/post/open-source-community-simplified/ it's a great document. I think it's worth asking ourself : "what are we doing well, what could we improve" This question is specifically sent to new contributors: what did we well, what could be improve for new/future newbies ? -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/