Hi Nicole, I think I like the idea - it seems logical. It failed the first step - the sign-off, so it's 'Failed sign-off'. Also a bit less harsh than failing QA :) Katrin Am 04.03.2015 um 13:39 schrieb Nicole Engard:
Hi all,
I'm at the hackfest right now and have found an interesting problem with our statuses. I find a lot of bugs that are in a status of needs signoff but have conversations going on after the patch has been submitted. I feel like we need another status in here. Kyle suggested something like 'failed signoff' which isn't quite 'failed qa' but it does mean something has to be done to the patch before it needs signoff. I'm not picky - but I've found a lot of these such bugs this week and feel we need some way to remove these from the 'needs signoff' list to make it more efficient.
Suggestions? Comments? Feelings?
Nicole
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/