24 May
2011
24 May
'11
2:12 p.m.
Le 23/05/2011 14:48, Chris Nighswonger a écrit :
So my vote is to use this method unless there is a very compelling reason to do otherwise. What's happening with
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6328 (see comment 20) is interesting. I think the idea of atomic updates is very interesting. And the workflow/wiki must be updated anyway ! So I vote for atomic updates + updating the wiki to explain very clearly how to test a patch with a DB rev. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08