Le 21/02/2012 14:40, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
Why not call it invoices, and be not consistent with an inconsistency? The 1st patch was without the "aq" and some noticed this inconsistency... Overall I think it's more consistent to have the "aq" for now.
Renaming all aq tables is theoretically preferred of course. But is it worth the energy? I think that, on the long term, yes, it's worth the energy. I'm sure you've been surprised more than once by some inconsistencies: ppl that know how Koha work don't have much problem with them. But being consistent helps a lot ppl to understand how things are written when they start hacking.
PS: I agree that the table prefix is not the biggest inconsistency we have. About SQL, the biggest one is probably singular/plural table names ! -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08