Am 02.07.2013 21:30, schrieb Chris Cormack:
* Galen Charlton (gmc@esilibrary.com) wrote:
Hi, On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Marcel de Rooy <M.de.Rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> wrote:
Saw this note from Paul on bug 7167. Probably, your answer may be of interest to more people. We can all see 40 patches in that queue, but we do not know your strategy in handling them (apart from the fact that it is different from that of former RMs). But I could have missed something :)
It's quite simple -- I do not consider my job as being one of automatically pushing any patch that reaches the passed-QA status. I will take the time I need to review and test nearly [1] every patch, and in particular any like bug 7167 that proposes a significant change.
Which isn't really that different from the previous RM, or speaking for myself, when I did RM or RMaint. I, for one, welcome the scrutiny. We are all human (at least I'm pretty sure we all are) and we make mistakes. Galen has caught at least one thing I missed when QAing.
Stability FTW :)
Chris
And he has also found something I missed - scrutiny and stability FTW :) I think Galen is doing a wonderful job as RM and I wouldn't want him to do it any different. Katrin