Hi all, Recently we discussed in the QA team to make the default QA contact empty. (Ian cleared this field for all components now [for new reports].) In the process the QA team member that starts QA on a report now, enters his name in the QA contact field. This informs reporter, patch writer, etc. that QA started and is also helpful for other QA team members in order to prevent duplication of work. My question now is: Should we do something similar with the default Assignee per component? In practice, the current default assignees will (most of the time) not be working on reports entered by someone else. Having someone in the Assignee field who is not working on that report, could be a misleading signal for an unaware Bugzilla user. If the default assignee wants to be informed on reports of that category, moving him/her to the default CC list of that component would perhaps be better? The current default assignees are (for one or more components): nengard@gmail.com<mailto:nengard@gmail.com> henridamien@koha-fr.org<mailto:henridamien@koha-fr.org> gmcharlt@gmail.com<mailto:gmcharlt@gmail.com> oleonard@myacpl.org<mailto:oleonard@myacpl.org> chris@bigballofwax.co.nz<mailto:chris@bigballofwax.co.nz> kyle.m.hall@gmail.com<mailto:kyle.m.hall@gmail.com> koha.sekjal@gmail.com<mailto:koha.sekjal@gmail.com> frederic@tamil.fr<mailto:frederic@tamil.fr> cnighswonger@foundations.edu<mailto:cnighswonger@foundations.edu> robin@catalyst.net.nz<mailto:robin@catalyst.net.nz> colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com<mailto:colin.campbell@ptfs-europe.com> paul.poulain@biblibre.com<mailto:paul.poulain@biblibre.com> wizzyrea@gmail.com<mailto:wizzyrea@gmail.com> Would you agree with this move? (We need of course consensus before doing so.) Would you like to be added as default CC for one or more components? Please respond. Thanks, Marcel