If I've got time to test only one of these, which is more important? On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tonnesen Steve wrote:
I've uploaded two new release candidates to sourceforge:
1.2.2RC4 Fixes minor problems in 1.2.1
RC3 was downloaded over 200 times from sourceforge and I heard few complaints. The changes in RC4 are small and shouldn't cause any new problems. If I don't hear any complaints, I think we should release 1.2.2 based on RC4 tomorrow.
Changes in RC4:
- installer.pl asks for the location of apache's config file if it can't find it - Fix to updatedatabase script that fixes a problem with full acquisitions - Fixed bad link in detail.tmpl (pointed to intradev.katipo.co.nz)
1.2.3RC5 - major changes: templating and authentication module
RC4 was only downloaded 12 times. I suspect that this one needs a lot more testing. I think that putting the release candidates in the koha-unstable project reduces the likelihood of people installing them on production systems but also reduces the amount of testing that gets done on release candidates? Not that I'm complaining. The first effect makes it well worth it. :)
Changes in RC5:
- Fix to Auth.pm that broke basic authentication feature - Fix to updatedatabase fixes problem with full acquisitions
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/koha-devel
-- Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams http://pgp.mit.edu/ | Systems Administrator UT-GSLIS =----------------------------------+------------------------------- All syllogisms contain three lines | broot@gslis.utexas.edu Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew