MJ Ray a écrit :
I suggest that version could be a long number, like in Perl : N.SSTTVVV : [...] We are currently in Koha 2.0209001
Perl currently uses x.y.z format, but if it's much simpler to have N.SSTTVVV, then go ahead.
I agree that having 4 numbers maybe too much. But if we have only 3, like Perl, then we have only 2 available for public release (as the last numbers are for developpers DB updates) So, it means we have : Koha 3.0, 3.1, 3.2..., 3.15, 3.16,... => same functionnal branch, only bugfixes & minor changes Koha 4.0, 4.1,... => next major version I think this solution is simpler, but it's a big change in our naming conventions. So let's argue + and - of this solution. I think I don't care which one we choose finally. -- Paul POULAIN et Henri Damien LAURENT Consultants indépendants en logiciels libres et bibliothéconomie (http://www.koha-fr.org) Tel : 04 91 31 45 19