Le 14/11/2010 20:34, Chris Cormack a écrit :
On 15 November 2010 08:28, LAURENT Henri-Damien <henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com> wrote:
Le 14/11/2010 18:32, Chris Cormack a écrit :
On 15 November 2010 06:25, LAURENT Henri-Damien <henridamien.laurent@biblibre.com> wrote:
Le 11/11/2010 15:19, Ian Walls a écrit :
Ah, right, I'd forgotten about that switch, as it doesn't work with authorities, and I can't do rebuild_zebra.pl <http://rebuild_zebra.pl> -a -b -x -z in my crontab.
So, the ISO2709 character limit is not actually an issue at all, then.
Well, actually, it is in koha. Since Koha gets iso2709 from a zebra search. If it Koha would take marcxml, it would be even slower to get search results with the Search.pm as it stands now... And let me know if you know a librarian who would like that.
Yep, there is utterly no doubt C4::Search needs a rewrite. This was a goal of 3.4. I'm pretty sure I mentioned it in my proposal, and we had some volunteers to work on it. Who ? What is their plan ? Where is the discussion about the rewrite ? Where is the code ? Is there a working group on that ? Is there any place for collaboration ?
Wow, why so hostile, I just pointed out that it was in my RM proposal, it's on the wiki. The volunteering was done on irc, if i remember rightly and as far as I know no one has written a plan up yet. I don't see the need to jump on me for saying it.
However, I still maintain that without a proper search engine abstraction layer, I would consider any work on Search to be unfinished.
It was simple questions, to get some information. It looked to me that you were saying that there was already a team working on C4::Search rewrite. I was not aware of that and saw no discussion on some ongoing work on C4::Search other than the ones on Solr, which we initiated. Friendly -- Henri-Damien LAURENT