Hi, On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Henri-Damien LAURENT <laurenthdl@alinto.com> wrote:
As far as we (BibLibre) are concerned, even though it was talked about a while back, we are in fact not candidate for the QA management position in 3.2. So the position is indeed open: anyone volunteering ?
Joshua may be a volunteer; I'll let him toss his hat in the ring directly if he chooses. But going beyond the QA position, I would be interested in setting up a mechanism for distributing the review and signoff of important patches across as many contributors as are willing to do it, which might ease the burden on the QA manager a bit.
But I'm really willing to be Release Maintainer for 3.0.
Great. What are your plans (roughly speaking) for maintaining 3.0.x?
We fully support what Chris said about the roles being spread around as many organisations as possible. By the same token we support his candidacy to be the translation manager.
As do we.
But I also think we should be clear about what those positions would mean. Specifically, these roles (Q&A, RM for 3.1, RMaint for 3.0, Translation) should have ssh access to the git repository via a key so that they can do what their position requires them to do, with sign-off of their commits so that RM can be informed in real time of what has been done.
This can be done on a branch-by-branch basis. In other words, we can set it up so that the 3.0 maintainer can push directly to the 3.0.x branch. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Research & Development, LibLime galen.charlton@liblime.com p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 skype: gmcharlt _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel