On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> wrote:
Le 27/01/2011 17:49, Ian Walls a écrit :
Branches that are not receiving active testing feedback would receive attention towards creating a simpler, easier to follow testing plan.
Do you really think? I don't think so: If that were the case, then someone should/would have said "well seems interesting, but I need more information/help/..."
This is problematic for the same reason it's problematic to organize a QA session on IRC: It's hard to find the right people at the right time. It's daunting to approach a QA branch which has an unknown scope, and hard to ask questions if you don't know what you're looking for. If there is a branch to test, I want to know as much as possible about what is to be tested We have the right infrastructure with the workflow we have if these conditions are met: 1. The branch covers one feature/fix. 2. The feature/fix is described in a bug report. If these things are true I've got everything I need in order to test. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org