On 2004-11-02 19:30:39 +0000 Nathan Gray <kolibrie@southernvirginia.edu> wrote:
On 2004-10-31 20:22, Stephen Hedges wrote:
Does anybody have any suggestions and/or strong feelings about a document revision numbering system? I like the idea that documentation is tied to the code it documents, by version number. I am much less interested in how many iterations a document has gone through, than I am interested in which version of a page is documented.
I like this. I would probably have made 2.0.x release tarballs more often if there had been more documentation updates to include. How about using 2.0.2, 2.0.2p1, 2.0.2p2 and so on? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Unsolicited attachments to the pipex address deleted Will HLF fund tree-killings? http://www.thewalks.co.uk/