Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com>
I would say that we do not need that check everywhere, but I would keep it at login time. This idea could be investigated for someone that log-in with admin
Le 23/11/2011 17:02, Marcel de Rooy a écrit : permission, for example. Does others think it's a must-have ? Here at BibLibre, most of us think checking the database update is a part of an update, so if it's not made, it means you're doing a poor job.
I think it may be a good idea. Not only experts like you and me install Koha. Some hobbyists and accidental tech workers are doing it for themselves. What would be very cool is if the version number was computed somehow from the updates that had been applied (which may make it go nonlinear) in a way that we could see what been applied. One possibility would be for the RM to give each update a prime number and we just sum them, but the version number might get verrrry big. Can anyone do better or should we junk that idea? Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Webmaster, Debian Developer, Past Koha RM, statistician, former lecturer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for various work through http://www.software.coop/