Le 19/09/2018 à 16:44, Marcel de Rooy a écrit :
Should we replace Signed-off-by by Tested-By (for testers) and Reviewed-By (for QA) ? Should we use Signed-off-by as suggested in the git-commit manpage ? Bit late in the project to make this change imo? But yes, our interpretation is quite different ;) But it's never too late to make a positive change, right ? :)
If we should switch to Tested-by and Reviewed-by (note: lowercase by), we should better start at a version release? Probably, this would make it easier to distinguish between the two different meanings of Signed-off-by in the git history. That means all 'Signed off' patches would have to be rewritten after that release. A bit tedious but not impossible.
If so, what about the Bugzilla status Signed off etc. I hadn't thought of that. Can the status be renamed easily ? git-bz would need to be updated as well (and maybe other tools ?).
-- Julian Maurice <julian.maurice@biblibre.com> BibLibre