22 Feb
2012
22 Feb
'12
1:15 p.m.
Owen wrote:
If someone want to write that, it's fine with me. It's a little over my head. That still leaves open the question of whether there is a course of action for getting this tested an approved which will be timely enough to make it worthwhile.
That is an interesting question in general too. If we have community consensus on some kind of change (before programming started) resulting in "time-sensitive" patches, could we have some procedure to get them on a priority lane through signoff and QA? This would probably involve not only consensus on the changes but also the promise for a quick signoff from other members. Opening up a more general discussion?