Hi koha-devel, During my investigation on bug 668 [1], I've started discovering how reserve worked. I must admit I'm a bit disappointed about several points: 1. A reserve can be linked to a biblio or to an item. I've asked hdl on IRC in which case it was useful to reserve a specific item, he told me that was to avoid preventing an issue on another branch. My opinion is that this is not the right design if branches independance is the reason of item number in reserve table. 2. Reserve cancellation can only be made when reserve is linked to an item (this is the origin of the problem, coming from the correction on the bug 969 [2]). When trying to issue an item reserved, only the first reserve is displayed for confirmation of cancel and only the first reserve is cancelled if asked by the librarian, without changing the priority of other reserves. I think it's a bug of course. 3. Finally, I really don't understand why Koha ask for reserve cancellation when issuing. A warning isn't enough? Why would a librarian cancel the reserve of borrower B1 if she authorizes B2 to issue the item? It doesn't make sense to me. Please help me to understand the deep origin of this design I don't understand :-) [1] http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=668 [2] http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=969 Bye -- Pierrick LE GALL INEO media system