24 Nov
2011
24 Nov
'11
4:23 a.m.
You know what this thread is missing? 2 cents from yours truly!
Perhaps a quick hash/CRC of the filenames of the patches that have been applied? Should be quick to generated and test, and will tell us immediately if we need to run again.
+1 from me My vote is for using a hash for identifying updates in every situation. Preferable to file names or hardcoded version numbers, in my view. -- Jared Camins-Esakov Bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 (e-mail) jcamins@cpbibliography.com (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/