Hi, All -- A small group of small NH libraries has co-sponsored a small enhancement to get its feet wet in the Koha development world: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14365 As I understand it, once a patch has been signed off & passed on to QA, it can hit a bottleneck as there are limited number of QA Team Members. To make this as positive experience as possible for our informal consortium & to increase the chances of similar collaborations in the future, it would help if we can move through the development process as quickly as possible. So here's my question -- For sponsored (i.e., funded) projects, would it make sense to include funds to pay for the cost of a QA Team Member's time to review a patch? I'm thinking the financial commitment would be one way of boosting a patch's status in the queue. Hounding the developer is another option, of course, but that's unpleasant for both sides :-) I realize the QA person often, & perhaps preferably, will work for a different firm. And there may be other complicating factors I'm not aware of. Grateful for any thoughts from folks on the programming side of things. Cheers, Cab Vinton, Director Plaistow Public Library Plaistow, NH