Hello world, I see a change in the wiki : " Contributors to Koha are encouraged to reference a bug number with every commit. This helps us determine the purpose of the commit and establishes a more searchable and understandable history. If there is no bug open at [[http://bugs.koha.org|bugs.koha.org]] that addresses your contribution, please feel free to open one and describe the bug or enhancement. Then, include the bug number in your commit message and set the "priority" field to "patch-sent". This helps us keep track of patches that have been contributed but not yet applied. " I fully agree with the idea of pointing the bug if there is one. But I strongly disagree about adding a bug if there is none. For at least 2 reasons : - it is an obviously "long" process to add a bug. If we have found a small & quickly fixed bug, then there is no need to add a bug imo. Having a complete patch comment is necessary for the ppl reviewing/validating the patch. But the need of a bug.koha.org is unclear to me (the PATCH-sent thing is not enough imo) - we (BibLibre) have a specific internal (& french) tool for our customer requests. When we fix a bug discovered by a client, frankly, it's a loss of time to translate it to english & rewrite it to bugs.koha.org Comments welcomed. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc NOUVEAU TELEPHONE : 04 91 81 35 08