MJ Ray wrote:
paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr> wrote:
Or have I been asleep? There are still 146 bugs awaiting QA and these must be closed before 2.0.0 final, IMO.
146 ??? I see only 45 of them. and 20 being really minor. what is your=20 bugzilla request ? (I may have missed something)
Bugs against 1.9.x releases marked RESOLVED. There are now 155. QA helpers (and *not* the coders) need to try to reproduce the bug and mark as VERIFIED if the resolution is correct, then invite reporter to CLOSED it. If reporter doesn't, then QA should close after some time (a week? During a 2.0 pre-release meeting?).
That's my understanding of how it should be handled, to try to avoid bugs that were reported getting into a release for sure. Ideally, QA would be coding tests, but I think that's really too much for us just now.
If people are OK about it, I will start doing this for non-installer stuff once I get some time again and a non-development installation :-(
[...]
That's my understanding too. That was expected with our QA manager, who dismissed. We're still waiting for a new candidate. Seems we have found a good one :-D . . . . . . . . . . Do you want this responsability ? -- Paul POULAIN Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)