At 10:28 AM 4/20/2012 +0200, Paul Poulain wrote:
We us a standard setting of 1024 x 768 on all monitors in our organization (from end-user kiosks to my desk-top.) For a graphical comparison, please see: <http://navalmarinearchive.com/admin/koha_home_page_comparison.html>. Yikes ! there's something wrong with your display of the display introduced by bug 7979 !!! (and I understand why you're complaining now). Attached is how it look for (all of ?) us. The menus are on the RIGHT of
Le 19/04/2012 22:47, Paul a écrit : [snip] the news, not BELOW !
which version of FF are you using ? any idea welcomed !
Paul - merci d'avoir répondu ... FF is version 11.0 (the latest, I think). Now to the nitty gritty. The html|css layout employs nested <div>s which are much more difficult to control across varying sized monitors compared to a <table width="100%">. The <div> does not resize vertical height to respect an overall width -- if you want to do that you have to introduce a horizontal scroll bar (js?) which can get ugly -- whereas the <table> will wrap text wherever it can to respect fixed width. With FF, I can, by reducing font size ( <ctrl> + <minus> ) bring the graphical menu back to your desired position. I thought this might have been because "font size" is not set in CSS, not even inherited from "body", but a live edit to staff-global.css adding a line such as: font-size: 13px; or font-size: 1em; in the body section has no effect. FYI Chrome 16.0.912.77 also breaks the page in the same way (and can be corrected with <ctrl> + <minus>), as does Opera 11.62 and Safari 5.1.1. I only have access to version 6.0.2900 of M$ Exploder -- and it breaks the page but cannot be corrected. The problem with using <ctrl> + <minus> is that a) most users don't know about it, and b) you have to reverse it (<ctrl> + <plus>) when you get to the following page ... ... et ça, c'est ennuyeux. Amitiés et a+ Paul [and apologies, I don't have an available sandbox right now - nor really the time - to do a test install of 3.8. I'm still testing all sorts of combinations of memcached, fcgid and Squid on 3.6 with various flavours of Apache 2.2 and 2.4 -- and of course I can't risk our production server.]