css for prog : a commit from me & pierrick rollback
Pierrick LE GALL a écrit :
Changes by: Pierrick LE GALL <plg@savannah.gnu.org> 06/04/18 09:53:10 Log message: modification: removed fieldset and label CSS properties. Modifications introduced by tipaul are not compliant with every template (depending on how you use HTML labels). Shouldn't this kind of customization only be made outside "prog" template? -fieldset { - display:inline; - vertical-align:top; - -label { - width:10em; -}
You're right pierrick, they should not be in PROG. However : - without this small label property, you can't see where you have forgotten the <label> - without the fieldset css, all fieldset are vertically aligned, and you get a lot of empty space on the right and a looonnnggg page. So I don't think they are a problem, and they should be reintroduced. What does ppl think of this ? -- Paul POULAIN et Henri Damien LAURENT Consultants indépendants en logiciels libres et bibliothéconomie (http://www.koha-fr.org)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:15:32 +0200 Paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr> wrote:
- without this small label property, you can't see where you have forgotten the <label>
My problem is a strange display of HTML code as follows: <table> <tr> <th><label for="foo">Foo</label></th> <td><input type="text" if="foo" /></td> </tr> </table> My table alignment is scratched. IMO HTML labels are semantic only, they should not be CSS customized.
- without the fieldset css, all fieldset are vertically aligned, and you get a lot of empty space on the right and a looonnnggg page.
It's only customization in my opinion. Where do we start customization, where do we stop? I don't say we should never customize PROG, I just wonder how far we go into customization. Bye -- Pierrick LE GALL INEO media system
participants (2)
-
Paul POULAIN -
Pierrick LE GALL