[Koha-devel] Re: Re: non-simple publication years?

[acli@ada.dhs.org via news-to-mail gateway]

In article <20021210053441.GZ19373 at katipo.co.nz>,
Chris Cormack  <chris at katipo.co.nz> wrote:
>These dates are just for bibliographic data right?
>IE you dont want to use "Chinese" format dates for issuing?
>Purely as bibliographical data?

For us, yes, purely as bibliographical data.

There is a chance that some of our friends in the ROC will
really want to use Republic dates for issuing, but I can't
speak for them :-/



-- 
Ambrose Li  <a.c.li at ieee.org>
http://ada.dhs.org/~acli/cmcc/  http://www.cccgt.org/

DRM is theft - We are the stakeholders