[Koha-devel] Re: MARC links
paul POULAIN
paul.poulain at free.fr
Thu Mar 20 03:33:01 CET 2003
Stephen Hedges wrote:
>Paul (amd Chris) -
>
>I've attached my list of suggested links between the koha database and the MARC
>database.
>
>As you can see, some of the links need to be repeatable. 1.9.0 currently
>accepts only the last link that's entered when there are duplicate links, which
>means the "Checks MARC" function always reports errors.
>
>I've sprinkled other comments in the body of the text attachment.
>
>Stephen
>
1 month after, I haven't forgotten this mail, and use it.
I try to improve the MARC21 english parameters for 1.9.1, to have a
working parameters in the release.
[biblio table]
biblionumber 090 c Koha biblionumber
author 100 a Personal name
title 245 a Title
unititle 246 a Title proper/short title
notes 500 a General note
serial 400 v Volume number/sequential designation
seriestitle 440 a Title
copyrightdate 260 c Date of publication, distribution, etc
timestamp 005 DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
[computer generated]
/
==> for instance, timestamp is not auto-managed in koha. It should be
possible to develop a plugin to do this./
abstract 520 a Summary, etc
[biblioitems table]
biblioitemnumber 090 d Koha biblioitemnumber
biblionumber 090 c Koha biblionumber
volume 440 v Volume number/sequential designation
number 440 n Number of part/section of a work
classification 082 a Classification number
[or it could be an extra subfield in the 090 tag, since
this + dewey + subclass = callnumber]
[classification, dewey, and subclass could also be:
classification 852 h Classification part
dewey 852 k Call number prefix
subclass 852 m Call number suffix]
/
==> i've chosen 852 h/k/m, which seems better, and will work fine./
itemtype
[this probably should be added as a 955 subfield]
/
==> i think you speak of 995, not 955. In this case, it's a bad idea.
995 fiels are related to ITEMS, and itemtype is a biblioitem field. I've
choosen 686a
/
isbn 020 a International Standard Book Number
issn 022 a International Standard Serial Number
publicationyear 260 c Date of publication, distribution, etc
volumedate 260 c Date of publication, distribution, etc
/==> multi-linked field... 260c is the only remaining multi-linked field
(see below for 500a, and dewey 090b is solved by using 852h/k/m)
In fact, those fields are differents things, and i'm surprised to see
marc21 doesn't differenciate them. I think our best solution is to
choose one, and do with it.
/publishercode 260 b Name of publisher, distributor, etc
volumeddesc 300 all PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
/
==> I really don't find any MARC21 field for volume desc. Maybe we can
ignore this
/
timestamp 005 DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
illus 300 b Other physical details
pages 300 a Extent
notes 500 a General note
/
==> As 500a is already used for biblio notes, i don't know where to put
biblioitem notes.
Note too that i think biblioitem notes is a unuseful field (biblio.notes
and item.notes are enough no ?)/
size 300 c Dimensions
place 260 a Place of publication, distribution, etc
lccn 010 a LC control number
marc [what's in this field?]
/==> this field is not used, don't worry :-)/
url 856 u Uniform Resource Identifier
[items table]
[lots of gaps here, all needing new 995 subfields?]
/==> I've added some, and there's no problem to have unmapped fields.
For example, i don't think it's important to hare prices and bookseller
info in the MARC record.
/
itemnumber 995 s Koha item number
biblionumber 090 c Koha biblionumber
multivolumepart
biblioitemnumber 090 d Koha biblioitemnumber
barcode 995 f barcode
dateaccessioned 995 m dateaccessioned
booksellerid
homebranch 995 d homebranch
price
replacementprice
replacementpricedate
datelastborrowed
datelastseen
multivolume
stack
notforloan 995 o notforloan
itemlost
wthdrawn
bulk
issues
renewals
reserves
restricted
binding
itemnotes 995 u item notes
holdingbranch
paidfor
timestamp 005 DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
--
Paul POULAIN
Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres
responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20030320/5102e38f/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Koha-devel
mailing list