[Koha-devel] Image/Graphics Magick confusion
Joe Atzberger
ohiocore at gmail.com
Thu Jul 15 17:03:12 CEST 2010
Yeah, the whole point of preferring distro packages is for binaries and
distro-specific configs. Any decent image manipulation components will rely
on binary code for performance. Unfortunately, too many CPAN modules fail
to build XS correctly on a given platform (including debian, historically),
hence the distro package approach.
What kind of complication are you seeing?
--joe
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Chris Nighswonger <
cnighswonger at foundations.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Colin Campbell
> <colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com> wrote:
> < snip >
> > wondered if there are any advantages in using Graphics Magick rather
> > than Image Magick (as imagemagick has the advantage that the perl module
> > can be installed from CPAN )
>
> Only that with Graphics Magick you get both binaries and perl module
> in one shot. With Image Magick you'll have to cpan the perl module and
> then get the binaries via some other mechanism depending on your *nix
> flavor.
>
> Otherwise there is probably no advantage to what we are doing with it.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20100715/b0ffe39c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Koha-devel
mailing list