[Koha-devel] externalising translator and etc

Chris Nighswonger cnighswonger at foundations.edu
Wed Nov 10 23:55:47 CET 2010


On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Galen Charlton <gmcharlt at gmail.com> wrote:

> -1 for moving etc to a separate Git project.  The default
> configuration files are an integral part of Koha.  For variant
> configurations such as a Plack or nginx config, it would be clearer to
> have relevant files in subdirectories or identified by file name
> instead of putting them in branches.  That way, somebody installing
> Koha for the first time would see (say) both an etc/koha-apache.conf
> and an etc/koha-nginx.conf; i.e., all of the options would be directly
> in front of them.  Furthermore, often changes made to files in etc are
> dependent on changes made to code or templates; separating etc and the
> rest of Koha into submodules would make it harder to prepare patches
> and manage topic branches.
>
>
I'm with Galen here.


> 0 for moving the PO files to a separate Git project.  The size of the
> repository doesn't really strike me as a big deal; the Git protocol is
> pretty efficient.  That said, while I don't see a great deal of
> benefit to splitting the translations off into a separate repository,
> I don't see much harm either.
>

If setting up the PO files as a separate project allows one PO repo to be
"submoduled" to several Koha repos then I can see how this might benefit a
multi-koha server. As it is, we don't implement any language other than
English, so it really does not matter to me one way or the other.

Kind Regards,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/koha-devel/attachments/20101110/47504a0a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Koha-devel mailing list