[Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database
Frère Sébastien Marie
semarie-koha at latrappe.fr
Tue Feb 15 11:53:30 CET 2011
Hello,
As we obtain no reply for an inconsistent database, I will explain again the problem, with SQL for examples.
Currently, after using imported set of notices and using it we have the following results:
SELECT count(*)
FROM biblioitems
WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') != ''
AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') NOT IN (
SELECT authid FROM auth_header );
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 121 |
+----------+
english-version: If I extract from MarcXML (on table biblioitems) the 700.9 (Primary Author, koha_internal_code) and search in auth_header, we currently have 121 items with no-existent 700.9 .
This is only a part of the problem: some 700.9 are existent but wrong (points to bad authority).
SELECT count(*)
FROM biblioitems, auth_header
WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') = auth_header.authid
AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="a"]') != extractvalue(auth_header.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="200"]/subfield[@code="a"]');
+----------+
| count(*) |
+----------+
| 3 |
+----------+
Any suggestions ? This seems a bug (in import of notices where old koha_internal_code is not removed), but I would prefered have your opinion before submit a bugreport.
And I will like some clues to correct the inconsitences !
Thanks.
--
Frère Sébastien Marie
Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe
61380 Soligny-la-Trappe
Tél: 02.33.84.17.00
Fax: 02.33.34.98.57
Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Frère Sébastien Marie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently, we have imported a set of notices, from another abbey, in
> the reservoir.
>
> When we create a new examplar using the previous imported notices,
> the field 700.9 (authority - internal koha number) refering the
> auth_id isn't updated or removed (still reference the old authority
> number, in the other catalog).
>
> As result, we have an examplar with 700.a (authority name) correct,
> but with an internal reference wrong (not valid in us catalog).
>
> If we search all notices linked with an authority, there is wrong
> attribution.
>
> Next an example.
>
> Starting with:
> - Notices in reservoir:
> - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) [from import]
>
> - Authority in catalog:
> - Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally]
>
> - Notice in catalog:
> - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1)
>
>
> Next, we create a new examplar based on notice in reservoir, result:
> - Authority in catalog:
> - Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally]
>
> - Notice in catalog:
> - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1)
> - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1)
>
> (doubt if Author_A added in authorities or not)
>
> Now, if search notice attached with Author_B (auth_id = 1):
> results:
> - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1)
> - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1)
>
> The database is inconsistent.
>
> Where is the problem:
> - a misused of imported MARC: an option somewhere should be set...
> - a bug in importing MARC: 700.9 should be cleaned before import...
> - another possibility ?
>
> Currently, no bug report filled, as I don't no if it is a misusing
> or a bug.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Frère Sébastien Marie
> Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe
> 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe
> Tél: 02.33.84.17.00
> Fax: 02.33.34.98.57
> Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/
More information about the Koha-devel
mailing list