[Koha-devel] Hacker's corner week 10

Chris Cormack chris at bigballofwax.co.nz
Mon Mar 7 09:34:46 CET 2011


On 7 March 2011 21:30, Marcel de Rooy <M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> wrote:
> Paul,
> This is more than helpful! Very GOOD. I think we should indeed have a weekly mailing of bugs needing attention. Just a few additional remarks:
>
> An alinea with some statistics like you gave would be nice each time. Hopefully, the number of 150 needing signoff goes down (it was like 170).
> Pushed to close: imo they should be closed by the one who reported, wrote the patch or signed the patch, and not by someone else.

The one who reported would be ideal, the person who signed off ok if
no one else will do it. But not the person who wrote the patch.
Signing off your own patches, or closing bugs that you wrote the fix
for means that no one independent has tested. As release manager I
don't like this idea at all. Id rather a bug stay open, than have it
closed by the person who wrote the fix.

> Mentioning these bugs is not the first issue.
> Some abbreviations could be explained: blo=blocker for instance.
> Some of us would maybe like to add a few bug numbers for attention or discussion: would it be handy to open a page on the wiki for that purpose? To mention a few: discussion on 5572 (I mailed the list already, but no response yet). Discuss reopening 2173 (I would favor restoring OpacNav on detail screen). Etc. Etc.
>
Why not just reply to the mail with the bugs you want to highlight.

Chris


More information about the Koha-devel mailing list