[Koha-devel] Error in biblio.pm

[Chris Cormack]

On 30 March 2011 11:27, Paul <paul.a at aandc.org> wrote:
> At 10:14 AM 3/30/2011 +1300, Chris Cormack wrote:
>
> On 30 March 2011 10:06, Paul <paul.a at aandc.org> wrote:
>> I would appreciate some assistance with biblionumber and biblioitemnumber,
>> given that we can no longer enter new biblios.
>>
>> Error code is : "Tag "" is not a valid tag. at
>> /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Biblio.pm line 2848"
>>
>> That line (under the head : "Internal function to add or update
>> biblionumber
>> and biblioitemnumber to
>> the MARC XML" is the first of these four:
>>
>> Â  Â  Â  Â my $new_field = MARC::Field->new(
>> Â  Â  Â  Â $biblio_tag, '', '',
>> Â  Â  Â  Â "$biblio_subfield" Â  Â  => $biblionumber,
>> Â  Â  Â  Â "$biblioitem_subfield" => $biblioitemnumber
>>
>> What are the values that biblio.pm is expecting, and where exactly are
>> they
>> input from GUI page
>>
>> <http://koha-admin/cgi-bin/koha/cataloguing/addbiblio.pl?biblionumber=0&z3950=1&frameworkcode=AB&breedingid=38301#>
>> ?
>>
>> It seems that the call is based upon biblionumber=0 [which is <10,
>> therefore
>> creating the error according line 2847 : "# biblionumber &
>> biblioitemnumber
>> are in the same field (can't be <10 as fields <10 have only 1 value)"] and
>> seeing as we are using a custom framework (cut down to what we need for
>> cataloguing staff purposes), I need to know what particular line I have
>> set
>> to "ignore" that is creating the error. What "Tag" have I left out?
>>
>> Can't find anything in the docs on this "Internal function."
>>
>> Thanks for any pointers,
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Have you messed around with the 999 field and subfields? Specifically
> breaking their mappings or deleting them entirely?
>
> Hi Chris - thanks for replying.
>
> The only difference between the "default" mapping and our "abbreviated"
> mapping is the deletion of two fields marked "obsolete" ( a Item type
> [OBSOLETE] subfield ignored and b Koha Dewey Subclass [OBSOLETE] Tab:0, Not
> repeatable, Not mandatory, hidden,).
>
> The two other fields are identical in both mappings ( c Koha biblionumber
> subfield ignored and d Koha biblioitemnumber subfield ignored ) with both
> hidden "constraints" set to -5.  These do say "see online help", but I
> haven't found it yet ;-{
>
Click on the little ? top right corner

Chris